3 ms·
He is talking about C. Continuations are irrelevant.
by hueving 11y ago
He is talking about C. Continuations are irrelevant.
- kazinator 11y agoThat point is clearly made in the comment you're replying to, with the additional point that if we are talking about C, then sizeof is an operator, not a function. It doesn't require parentheses, except when its operand is a type expression. No well-considered coding convention requires superfluous parentheses with sizeof, and there are good reasons to ban them. We should prefer code like: type *ptr = malloc(sizeof *ptr); /* no parens */ to type *ptr = malloc(sizeof (type)); In general it's often better to base sizeof on an ordinary expression rather than a type expression. If we don't use superfluous parentheses on sizeof, we can then look for sizeof followed by an open parenthesis to look for code where sizeof is applied to a type expression. sizeof (type) means "produce me a size_t value based on some arbitary type, without checking that it's related to anything in the surrounding code". It can be as dangerous as a (type) cast.