A logic expert eh? May I suggest that concluding that there is significant difference between wine based on the price, despite scientific evidence to contrary,

A logic expert eh? May I suggest that concluding that there is significant difference between wine based on the price, despite scientific evidence to contrary, because another class of items does show a value/price relationship is a nice example of: * Appeal to probability * Argument from (personal) incredulity * False equivalence And I'm sure a few others.