27 ms·
No it wasn't. Here are the charges that were involved in this trial. http://freeross.org/the-case-the-goal-and-why-this-matters-2/ http://freeross.org/the-case
by jabscam2013 11y ago
No it wasn't. Here are the charges that were involved in this trial.
http://freeross.org/the-case-the-goal-and-why-this-matters-2/ http://freeross.org/the-case-the-goal-and-why-this-matters-2...
- mpyne 11y agoFeel free to grep for 'murder-for-hire' in this document https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1391926/gov-uscourts-nysd-422824-142-0.pdf https://s3.amazonaws.com/s3.documentcloud.org/documents/1391..., where the judge ruled on the admissability of evidence about Ulbricht's attempts to hire murderers to kill 6 people. Or if you don't grep, you could just start from the beginning; the judge essentially leads off with the murder-for-hire subplot right from the beginning of her ruling. As mentioned by dragonwriter, this murder-for-hire scheme was an overt act charged as part of Count One of the indictment (p5) http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-sdny/legacy/2015/03/25/US%20v.%20Ross%20Ulbricht%20Indictment.pdf http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao-sdny/legacy/...