3 ms·
Speaking as someone who's on your side in this debate... Rights are what you get if a bunch of rational, self-interested people get together and say, "What oug
by javert 11y ago
Speaking as someone who's on your side in this debate...
Rights are what you get if a bunch of rational, self-interested people get together and say, "What ought we be allowed to do without interference?"
There is a single, correct, rational answer to that: you ought to be allowed to do anything that doesn't initiate force against someone else. All rights are a function of that single fundamental observation.
Every rational, fully self-interested person (who has studied the topic a lot) will agree on this.
So that's where rights come from... they are a human construct, but there's also a single, objectively correct answer.
So they don't come from "Laws of Nature" or the Founding Fathers.
- tedunangst 11y agoWell, no shit. All the rational people agree with you, and everyone who disagrees is irrational. Didn't see that coming.
- titaniumdecoy 11y ago> So that's where rights come from... they are a human construct, but there's also a single, objectively correct answer. Ironically (since you are obviously a rational, self interested person), this statement is objectively false.
- javert 11y agoI would appreciate an explanation for why you say that.