4 ms·
Your hypothesis was that machines lower the entry level for war. The counterexample of using untrained, disposable child soldiers indicates that the entry level
by biot 11y ago
Your hypothesis was that machines lower the entry level for war. The counterexample of using untrained, disposable child soldiers indicates that the entry level is already zero. Consequently, your hypothesis is wrong; the entry level for war is actually raised via expensive machines.
- ArtDev 11y agoRobots like the knight armor of long ago, are very expensive. I highly recommend this TED talk about how the future of war could return us a feudal world. http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_suarez_the_kill_decision_shouldn_t_belong_to_a_robot?language=en http://www.ted.com/talks/daniel_suarez_the_kill_decision_sho...