7 ms·
As a person and a driver I'm willing to say the car should drive off the cliff. As a developer I wouldn't buy a car that would drive off the cliff. It's a tou
by anthony_d 11y ago
As a person and a driver I'm willing to say the car should drive off the cliff.
As a developer I wouldn't buy a car that would drive off the cliff.
It's a tough problem. Personally I would make a quickly/poorly thought out analysis of how to do the least damage. Being human I'd probably get it wrong.
- IgorPartola 11y agoI am more or less in the same boat as you. I do however think that a simple algorithm of "save people in the car" is better than "try to save objects identified as people outside the car" because it is simple and in the long run likely very effective. Making computers make moral/ethical decisions is difficult, especially with poor inputs.
- bladecatcher 11y ago>> As a developer I wouldn't buy a car that would drive off the cliff. What does being a developer have anything to do with it?
- grkvlt 11y agoA developer knows, through hard-won experience, that the algorithm to decide whether driving over a cliff is better for everyone is bound to have bugs, and will therefore gladly throw you off a cliff when it is the wrong thing to do ;( Non-developers would assume the computer to be (somewhat) infallible.