4 ms·
This looks promising. Our project has a plethora of selenium tests, but they're focused on functionality only, not appearance. We can tell there is a table, b
by planetjones 11y ago
This looks promising. Our project has a plethora of selenium tests, but they're focused on functionality only, not appearance. We can tell there is a table, button, link, form, etc. and click it. On that side we're reliable.
But we really let ourselves down sometimes with regressions to the look and feel of the application.
Are there any competitor tools for this visual testing ?
- mholmes680 11y agocheck eggplant / testplant (not free though)
- werkshy 11y agoWe (Harry's) have released a tool called Kontrast: https://github.com/harrystech/kontrast https://github.com/harrystech/kontrast, http://engineering.harrys.com/2014/09/24/kontrast.html http://engineering.harrys.com/2014/09/24/kontrast.html It's written in Ruby but is not really dependent on Rails or anything to run. We use it to compare a list of URLs between the version we are currently testing in CircleCI and our production site. Any differences are highlighted in a nice gallery and we get a message in our Hipchat room.
- lindig 11y agoYou can try https://app.webmate.io https://app.webmate.io. It's a hosted service for layout, regression, and cross-browser testing. Basic features are free. The diff-ing works on the DOM, is visualised in screenshots and identifies the XPath of elements that are found to be changed, removed, or added. Tests are run on browsers/vm that are part of the service, giving you access to 200+ os/browser combinations.
- johns 11y agoghostinspector.com (one of the products from my company)
- jbnicolai 11y agoThere's VisualReview[0], but only self-hosted. [0]: https://github.com/xebia/VisualReview https://github.com/xebia/VisualReview