4 ms·
If it needs no proof, it is not science either, and that was exactly the point I was making.
by gizi 11y ago
If it needs no proof, it is not science either, and that was exactly the point I was making.
- Oletros 11y agoYou don't know much about evolution, it seems
- knodi123 11y agoGo look up what kind of people use the word "evolutionism" and you might not be surprised.
- domas 11y agoYou didn't respond to any of the main points listed in the second paragraph. Would you say you can't find experiments for points (1) to (4)? Does point (5) needs any experiments? While point (6) just needs a more extensive definition. These 6 points are giving you the proof that you are asking for evolution to be proven in a scientific method. Edit: fixed typos.