> They are incentivized by fame and grant money to produce studies with a wow factor. That's why I said "peer reviewed". Sceptics have the same incentives as

> They are incentivized by fame and grant money to produce studies with a wow factor. That's why I said "peer reviewed". Sceptics have the same incentives as climatologists and when they just publish in newspapers and blogs, they don't have the peer review stage. There is absolutely NO guarantee of correctness or even scientific soundness. Whatever you may think of the peer review process, it's a good deal better than nothing.