I agree. The skeptics will claim (with some merit) that the climate journals (and even Science and Nature) are a little biased against denial articles. But that

I agree. The skeptics will claim (with some merit) that the climate journals (and even Science and Nature) are a little biased against denial articles. But that's no excuse to just publish in blogs though. Even if they can't find a climate journal to publish in, there would be other journals (physics journals, economics journals, applied mathematics journals) that would take a good skeptical article. They could even pull a Sokal, and use fake data and dodgy analysis to write an article aimed at discrediting the climate community. I haven't seen either of those happening, so I'm guessing that their position is still pretty weak.