4 ms·
If I'm the pope and I'm trying to cover up touching little boys in the naughty-place I would use the same reasoning. Imagine the liberal loons (or worse) gettin
by oldgregg 17y ago
If I'm the pope and I'm trying to cover up touching little boys in the naughty-place I would use the same reasoning. Imagine the liberal loons (or worse) getting airtime on CNN and huffpo and making it sound like all priests are pedophiles. We don't need those dirty filthy pagans, deliberately or not, spreading disinformation.
- rbanffy 17y agoThe difference is that there aren't huge corporations willing to dump tons of money on research that shows you molested young boys. And, in fact, if CNN and huffpo decided to say all priests are pedophiles, they would be spreading a lie. How would that serve the truth?
- rbanffy 17y agoThe comparison above is absurd. Nobody os afraid of CNN. What frightens me is that there is a lot of people willing to do whatever is necessary to preserve their profits. An easy comparison could be with the tobacco industry and their studies that proved no connection between smoking and cancer and how addictive smoking is. Next to big oil, the tobacco industry is a bastion of morality.
- rbanffy 17y agoDo you always compare climatologists to pedophile priests or this was a one time thing?