2 ms·
The bicameral mind sounds a lot like an early type of consciousness. I think Jaynes' timelines are off, but it is possible that our consciousness worked differe
by jotm 11y ago
The bicameral mind sounds a lot like an early type of consciousness. I think Jaynes' timelines are off, but it is possible that our consciousness worked differently back in the day. After all, we've seen how much humanity changed after switching to agriculture and farming.
Also "The picture Jaynes paints is that consciousness is only a very thin rime of ice atop a sea of habit, instinct, or some other process that is capable of taking care of much more than we tend to give it credit for"
Isn't this more or less the current theory of what consciousness is?
That it's a small part of the brain, and has little direct control over the brain/body, instead controlling it through indirect means such as habits, reflexes, instincts and other subconscious activities?
I mean, excluding all the "soul" and "God" theories, of course.
- mtbcoder 11y ago> The bicameral mind sounds a lot like an early type of consciousness. I think Jaynes' timelines are off, but it is possible that our consciousness worked differently back in the day. I agree, I see no reason that consciousness wouldn't follow evolutionary processes over time.
- digi_owl 11y agoI think one thing one must be careful off is to think everyone woke up one day and was conscious. It may well be that early writers etc was first on the scene so to speak, perhaps standing one leg in each group for quite some time. It could very well be that what made Buddha special is for everyone today, but be do not recognize it because it is so common and we don't expend effort to reach it.