>Honestly, I'm having a hard time believing he couldn't have been committed. He obviously wasn't in his right mind (and thus no it wasn't "his own damn fault".)

>Honestly, I'm having a hard time believing he couldn't have been committed. He obviously wasn't in his right mind (and thus no it wasn't "his own damn fault".) It said it in the write up - violence or threat of violence to others/self - is the qualifier for being committed against one's will. Here's the kicker, 9.9 out of 10 times, if committed against one's will (for any reason), the post-discharge relapse is quicker than two shakes of a lamb's tail as he releases his pent up resentment into another bottle.....