3 ms·
Honestly, I'm having a hard time believing he couldn't have been committed. He obviously wasn't in his right mind (and thus no it wasn't "his own damn fault".)
by empressplay 11y ago
Honestly, I'm having a hard time believing he couldn't have been committed. He obviously wasn't in his right mind (and thus no it wasn't "his own damn fault".)
- drpgq 11y agoSometimes I wonder with addiction what would happen if you took the person to a remote island where the boat comes only every six months. Would this guy have gotten better over six months? Or would he have found another way to destroy himself.
- martin1975 11y ago>Honestly, I'm having a hard time believing he couldn't have been committed. He obviously wasn't in his right mind (and thus no it wasn't "his own damn fault".) It said it in the write up - violence or threat of violence to others/self - is the qualifier for being committed against one's will. Here's the kicker, 9.9 out of 10 times, if committed against one's will (for any reason), the post-discharge relapse is quicker than two shakes of a lamb's tail as he releases his pent up resentment into another bottle.....