4 ms·
In the spirit of what others have said, why not take it a step further? Say: "we have not received 1 request," "we have not received 2 requests" etc etc. Some
by djoldman 11y ago
In the spirit of what others have said, why not take it a step further? Say: "we have not received 1 request," "we have not received 2 requests" etc etc. Somehow, I think this won't work.
- goodside 11y agoOr even: "The first byte of a message we are unable to deliver is not 0x00. The first byte of a message we are unable to deliver is not 0x01. The first byte..."
- plorg 11y agoWhile we're playing games of semantics, we might as well have fun. "A message we are unable to deliver is NOT 0xa89adf8d9a9c9a96899a9bdf9edfb19e8b9690919e93dfac9a9c8a8d968b86dfb39a8b8b9a8ddf8d9a8e8a9a8c8b969198..."
- striking 11y agoNSLs require that you report delayed data (on the order of a year, I think) and report only in broad ranges such as 0-249.