2 ms·
Very interesting link, thanks for sharing. From reading that, you can be near certain that RMS would agree.
by nickysielicki 11y ago
Very interesting link, thanks for sharing.
From reading that, you can be near certain that RMS would agree.
- JoshTriplett 11y agoOr that he would have in 1992. The landscape has changed quite a bit since then. And the terminology has improved greatly since then; for instance, nowadays the requirement would be described as making CLISP "GPL-compatible", rather than putting it under the GPL.