3 ms·
>If the state has a slam dunk case against your client that justifies the maximum sentence Having a slam dunk case in no way justifies the maximums. In many i
by will_brown 11y ago
>If the state has a slam dunk case against your client that justifies the maximum sentence
Having a slam dunk case in no way justifies the maximums. In many instances the Gov has a slam dunk case they still offer the minimums, because that is what the facts justify.
Whether or not the Prosecutor dangles the maximums to get you to plea to less, that has no bearing if the facts justify the offer, you can always open plea to the Court and cut the prosecutor out of the equation. There are other safe-guards.
- vidarh 11y ago> Having a slam dunk case in no way justifies the maximums. That wasn't what I implied, though I realise the wording was ambiguous. What I meant was "a slam dunk case where the facts justifies the maximum sentence". So both that the case is a slam dunk and that the maximum sentence is justified.