4 ms·

So is Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century) wrong on this one? Seems like all other centuries are calc

by pllbnk 11y ago

So is Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century) wrong on this one? Seems like all other centuries are calculated correctly.

sp332 11y ago
Yes. In fact both of the cited links http://www.rmg.co.uk/explore/astronomy-and-time/time-facts/faqs/new-millennium-where-when-why http://www.rmg.co.uk/explore/astronomy-and-time/time-facts/f... and http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/millennium.php http://aa.usno.navy.mil/faq/docs/millennium.php contradict it.
bostonpete 11y ago
Yes it's wrong. According to that page and the one on the 21st century, the year 2000 didn't belong to any century. Oddly, the wrong statement is listed as having two citations.
deleted 11y ago
[deleted]
eCa 11y ago
As of right now it appears to be correct (1901-2000, inclusive).