3 ms·
The fact that it's meant to be run in a browser is somewhat concerning. HTTPS is... okay... but for a GPG replacement I wouldn't really want to be dependent on
by ryukafalz 11y ago
The fact that it's meant to be run in a browser is somewhat concerning. HTTPS is... okay... but for a GPG replacement I wouldn't really want to be dependent on the CA system or a remote server.
- lisper 11y agoTwo responses: 1. You can run it on your own server, and you can run it from a FILE: URL (though that part is still work in progress). 2. This implementation is not the only one there will ever be. The goal of this implementation is just to make something that non-technical people can easily use in order to establish the (open) file interchange protocol. Then anyone who wants to can write native clients, email plugins, etc.