5 ms·
It's somewhat amusing to see this right underneath the Dell headline on the HN frontpage about running Linux on your Dell. Dell recently went private again in a
by chimeracoder 11y ago
It's somewhat amusing to see this right underneath the Dell headline on the HN frontpage about running Linux on your Dell. Dell recently went private again in an LBO after being public for 25 years, and now they're easily the most Linux-friendly large manufacturer of computers in the US.
IBM may have held that title for the Thinkpad at one point, but that's definitely becoming less and less true as Lenovo runs the Thinkpad line into the ground[0]
[0] Source: Typing this from my Thinkpad running Debian.
- SamReidHughes 11y agoHow has Lenovo made Thinkpads less Linux-friendly?
- WizzleKake 11y agoYou can brick certain ThinkPads with BIOS older than 2.08 by installing Linux on them. Not Linux-related, but the keyboard transition (happened between W520 and W530) was unfortunate and pissed a lot of people off. I'm sure the new keyboard design has its merits, but the fact that they changed it over the objection of their most loyal users speaks volumes about the direction Lenovo is taking the ThinkPad brand.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- robertfw 11y agoPurely anecdotal but the driver support for wifi on my T540p has given me no end of problems
- SamReidHughes 11y agoDo you have one of the Intel wifi cards?
- robertfw 11y agono, it's a Realtek. When I got the laptop, it wasn't working due to a kernal bug. I was able to get Wifi going using an external dongle. Then a kernal update fixed the bug and the internal worked. Since then something has changed and now neither work. I'm using Arch Linux... I used to have time to spend keeping things running and I enjoyed the slimmed down nature.. but these days I don't and I'm considering going back to Ubuntu.
- SamReidHughes 11y agoThat's pretty typical then. The advice for Thinkpads has long been to get an Intel wifi card, if you want to run Linux on it. In particular because it's the only name-brand known-quantity option you have at configuration.
- ChuckMcM 11y agoI observed that as a private company Dell was much more willing to embrace alternate architectures from AMD and Linux as an OS. Which really makes you wonder doesn't it? How does being publicly traded make you so coercible? I get the executive team has compensation tied to share price kind of arguments but Dell seems have done much better post LBO. What can they do now that they couldn't do then? And why? Looking forward to that HBR article if it ever gets written.
- tdicola 11y agoPublic companies have a fiduciary responsibility to show their shareholders growth every 4 months. Private companies can do absolutely anything as long as they're paying their bills and not breaking any laws.
- syedkarim 11y agoDo you mean quarterly earnings, so every 3 months?
- simonebrunozzi 11y agoI'm sure you meant "every quarter" or "every 3 months".
- caminante 11y agoAccording to Michael Dell's op-ed in the WSJ [1], two main benefits of going private are 1. longterm-planning => value + innovation and 2. activist shareholder avoidance. Michael Dell also has a track record for anti-competitive practices. Hell, the accountant and CFO from the days of their "cookie-jar accounting" schemes are still at Dell.[2] My understanding's that the anti-competitive measures weren't even illegal, it's just that Dell, as a public company, broke the law by failing to disclose the payments from Intel in Dell's financials. Going private removes this burden. [1] http://www.wsj.com/articles/michael-dell-going-private-is-paying-off-for-dell-1416872851 http://www.wsj.com/articles/michael-dell-going-private-is-pa... [2] https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-131.htm https://www.sec.gov/news/press/2010/2010-131.htm