3 ms·
Love seeing all these CSS replacements for Javascript. This is actually something I could see implemented on a website. Question is: is it actually faster / mor
by BorisMelnik 11y ago
Love seeing all these CSS replacements for Javascript. This is actually something I could see implemented on a website. Question is: is it actually faster / more efficient?
I see that there is about 900 some odd lines of CSS involved, which is quite a bit. I know some of this is normalize, which may be part of a normal website CSS infrastructure but could this be done in 100 lines of Javascript? Devils advocate question.
- franciscop 11y agoThat's the whole Picnic CSS library, including the tab plugin. The plugin itself is 97 lines of SCSS (including spaces). The odd part, and I'm the author I think is that sometimes the html get a bit overcomplicated and not flexible. You can see the source here: https://github.com/picnicss/picnic/blob/dev/plugins/tabs/_tabs.scss https://github.com/picnicss/picnic/blob/dev/plugins/tabs/_ta...