2 ms·
1. I don't know. 2. It isn't necessary after Sarbox. 3. It doesn't matter because they haven't been sued with Sarbox. They've been caught red-handed breaking
by fnordfnordfnord 11y ago
1. I don't know.
2. It isn't necessary after Sarbox.
3. It doesn't matter because they haven't been sued with Sarbox. They've been caught red-handed breaking plenty of other laws.
- res0nat0r 11y agoTherefore it sounds like the discussion here about holding the CEO directly responsible for these crimes is irrelevant and unenforceable.