4 ms·
I agree. The title is downright bizarre until you realize the article is consumed more by JS idiosyncrasies than about the OCaml modules.
by smosher_ 11y ago
I agree. The title is downright bizarre until you realize the article is consumed more by JS idiosyncrasies than about the OCaml modules.
- tel 11y agoWell, it certainly spent effort explaining JS oddities, but it's ostensibly about OCaml modules. So, it's either stream of consciousness and dependent on commentary to intuit meaning or merely failed in its goal.