5 ms·
Blogspam for a 2012 article: http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2012/08/08/hear-all-ye-people-hearken-o-earth http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opiniona
by Semiapies 11y ago
Blogspam for a 2012 article:
http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2012/08/08/hear-all-ye-people-hearken-o-earth http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2012/08/08/hear-...
Part 2: http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2012/08/09/hear-all-ye-people-hearken-o-earth-part-2/?_r=0&referrer= http://mobile.nytimes.com/blogs/opinionator/2012/08/09/hear-...
- logicallee 11y ago>Blogspam This word really isn't appropriate. (Similar to my thoughts here - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9572254 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9572254 ). The article here is interesting, approachable and good. Of course, your links add to it, it's the source mentioned in the first paragraph. But we can still read interesting secondary sources.
- Semiapies 11y agoIt doesn't add anything significant that's not in the original article. Worse, unlike most blogspam, it doesn't even directly link to the original article.
- monochromatic 11y agoAnd, bafflingly, it doesn't even give examples of all the fonts.
- logicallee 11y agoAll right. Though I thought the mention was pretty explicit, and a good summary of the research there. I also thought it's a super-quick read, and I learned something.