3 ms·
I think he meant LXD, the daemon for managing LXC containers written by Canonical. See https://www.stgraber.org/2015/04/21/lxd-getting-started/ https://www.stgr
by baghira 11y ago
I think he meant LXD, the daemon for managing LXC containers written by Canonical. See https://www.stgraber.org/2015/04/21/lxd-getting-started/ https://www.stgraber.org/2015/04/21/lxd-getting-started/.
I guess that the point is that, compared to other solutions, Docker was specifically meant to run with only one service per container instance.
- zwischenzug 11y agoLXD would make more sense, yes. The problem is those other solutions don't have traction. Also, LXD claims to be Ubuntu-specific: http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/tools/lxd http://www.ubuntu.com/cloud/tools/lxd
- baghira 11y agoGranted, I was not arguing for LXD as a ready for mass deployment tool. And certainy docker at the moment is more popular. However I don't think LXD is ubuntu specific, see https://github.com/lxc/lxd https://github.com/lxc/lxd https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/03/20/installing-lxd-and-the-command-line-tool/ https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/03/20/installing-lxd-and-th... I've just compiled it on Fedora 22 and both the daemon lxd and the cli tool lxc seem to work, haven't tested any container however.