3 ms·
So the judge says the screenings were not “integral and indispensable” and yet they are mandatory. Something seems off here.
by chrismcb 11y ago
So the judge says the screenings were not “integral and indispensable” and yet they are mandatory. Something seems off here.
- jgoewert 11y agoI still can't believe they went that way on this one. If there is pre-task an employer requires you to do before they start your main tasks, then that pre-task is still a task and the employee should be paid for it. If you can't figure out how to make that pre-task more efficient, then that is your fault as an employer. "But people may purposely do things to slow down the pre-task and make money doing their non-task." Then fire them for being laggards or figure out what is wrong with your process.
- sukilot 11y agoWhen SCOTUS makes a 9-0 ruling that goes the WTF way, it is because the law is (morally) wrong but Constitutional. In 1802, SCOTUS would rule 9-0 in favor of slavery, because the law was clear. SCOTUS fixes incoherent law, not morally wrong law.