4 ms·
> Cyronics certainly has a core set of beliefs (faith!?) that lead to action. You could describe basically every mundane activity as having a core set of belie
by nshepperd 11y ago
> Cyronics certainly has a core set of beliefs (faith!?) that lead to action.
You could describe basically every mundane activity as having a core set of beliefs that lead to action, but ok.
> I very much doubt that even if we were to develop sufficient technology to unfreeze all those heads, future humans would do so. Perhaps we'd unfreeze some heads for science and then a few more for the novelty.
Not reviving cryopreserved people is equivalent to leaving them to die... Unless you're counting on future society to be completely 100% morally bankrupt, I would bet on there being eventually at least one person with both enough of a conscience and enough money to fund the revival of people in suspended animation (as the cost of revival should decrease over time with advancing technology). Not that this really seems relevant to any connection to religion.
> Apropos, cryonics proposes its own cycle of rebirth! Well, possible rebirth until the great robot wars, the sun explodes, or the heat death of our local cluster.
FWIW, unlike religion, cryonics does not really claim you can come back from death. Legal death, yes, but legal death is merely a convenient criterion that captures "the point at which we give up on treating a person with current technology". If you set a cryonicist on fire and destroy their brain's information, they are permanently dead, just like anyone else.
(ETA: Since physics is reversible, destroying information is technically impossible, but capturing and calculating reversal of the trajectories of smoke, soot, air and photons back into a whole brain seems thermodynamically infeasible, even for a civilization with Big Angelic Powers.)
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- kolinko 11y agoiirc physics is non-reversible. Something to do with entrophy and possibly quantum physics.
- FeepingCreature 11y agoQuantum Physics is reversible; see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delayed_choice_quantum_eraser . (Warning: amateur, may be misunderstanding.) You do have to be able to capture the complete environment of the quantum process, which is why decoherence is usually considered one-way.