The fallacies here are multiple: 1) the assumption that intelligence can actually be measured (in which case it's really just "analytical intelligence"), 2) th

The fallacies here are multiple: 1) the assumption that intelligence can actually be measured (in which case it's really just "analytical intelligence"), 2) the assumption that other types of intelligence are less important, 3) the fact that you can't even measure creativity, period. I have a 148 IQ (and I'm a programmer- of COURSE I have high analytical intelligence) and I have been consistently humbled by the "less intelligent."