4 ms·
I live in a place where nothing fresh or natural grows for 7 months of the year, and for most of the other 5 what's fresh is still growing and "not ready yet".
by beloch 11y ago
I live in a place where nothing fresh or natural grows for 7 months of the year, and for most of the other 5 what's fresh is still growing and "not ready yet". The "eat local" movement is therefore directly opposed to eating "fresh and natural". It's not surprising that practically nobody eats local here. Yet, people have lived here for thousands of years.
Nomadic natives hunted buffalo, and you can bet they got sick of pemmican and jerky after a few months of being snowbound. It's no wonder that they considered liver, plucked fresh and warm from the body of a still-quivering kill, to be a delicacy. Settlers subsisted on stored grains and potatoes stored underground. They ate the occasional cow or chicken too and hunted for venison, but meat was not had with every meal. In the first half of the previous century canning techniques allowed them to greatly expand their diet by storing everything they could lay their hands on in the month or two of plenty. In the latter half of the twentieth century refrigeration let them expand their diet again. Today, fresh food from around the globe is brought in by plane, train, and automobile. Meanwhile, this province produces vast amounts of grains and beef for export all around the globe. By eating globally, we all eat better.
I don't know what global trends are like, but locally we're in the midst of another big transformation. When I was a child, almost everyone made their own meals. Eating out was expensive and rare. There was no local equivalent to England's fish&chip shops or the street vendors of Thailand. Even McDonald's was expensive when compared to home-cooking. That's changed. Restaurant fare has become so affordable that it's almost cheaper to eat out. The main downside to doing so is health. Restaurants always put in that extra pound of butter if the outcome will taste better. There are a few fledgling restaurants trying to carve out a niche for healthy fast-food. It will be interesting to see if they succeed.
- mikekchar 11y agoFood, as a commodity, is much cheaper than most people think. The price of rice is hovering around $400 per metric ton. Wheat is less than $250. Soybeans about $400. Pork is about $1500 per metric ton, Beef about 3 times that. According to random sites I googled, the average american eats just under a metric ton of food a year. Depending on what you eat, you could potentially eat for a year on considerably less than $1000, if you bought food at commodity prices. The reason we can't buy food at that price is because of all of the processing and handling that goes on between the farmer and the plate. A restaurant is just another level of processing and handling, so it appears to the average consumer that it isn't much more expensive than cooking at home. In reality, it is possible to source food in large quantities and to do all the processing yourself at a significantly reduced cost. There are even groups of people who do this for fun. With the advent of the internet it is now easier than ever to do it. However, the reason that this is not so popular is that most people in the western world are comparatively rich and have no free time. Most people don't care if they can cut $1000 a year from their food budget if it means that they have to invest 2 hours a day to do it. Many, many families have dual incomes, so even if we say that we could cut their overall household food budget by $4000, they wouldn't do it because they would have to give up one of those incomes. So, I don't think restaurants have gotten cheaper -- people have gotten richer, but have given up time to get the money.
- vram22 11y agoGood points about the cost of food. "comparatively rich and have no free time" That depends on the definition of "rich".