3 ms·
I agree. Technology has always made our lives better, and I cannot find a reason why technology applied to food would not be the same. It is also true, though,
by rhaps0dy 11y ago
I agree. Technology has always made our lives better, and I cannot find a reason why technology applied to food would not be the same.
It is also true, though, that modern ultra-processed foods are often the ones that are not healthy. Potato chips, sugar-laden pastries, not to speak of the now almost unseen trans-saturated fat.
Look at Soylent though. Not sure about its tastiness, but it's supposed to be all you need to eat.
- throwawayaway 11y agoit's a truism that just because something is new, or just because something is old - does not mean it is better or worse for that reason alone. perhaps with the notable exception of archaeological or other historical artifacts. another great truism is that value is subjective.
- rhaps0dy 11y ago>perhaps with the notable exception of archaeological or other historical artifacts And those are good not because they are old, but because they provide knowledge of the past.
- throwawayaway 11y agoyes in that case, the uniqueness is the valuable thing. if an artifact is one of many, like a chinese terracotta solider - it is less valuable than something more unique.
- Retra 11y agoSoylent doesn't taste bad, but It would take some willpower to actually not eat anything else.