But can you argue that an implicit bias is responsible for a gap of up to 23%? 23% is way too high to be a result of a totally heretofore unnoticed implicit bia

But can you argue that an implicit bias is responsible for a gap of up to 23%? 23% is way too high to be a result of a totally heretofore unnoticed implicit bias. By controlling for many environmental factors, the gap is in a range of 4.8% to 7.1% [1]. Not that that's excusable, but it shows the world isn't ending for women. [1]: http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20... (page 1)