3 ms·

There is no reason the number shouldn't be near 50%...What other conclusion can you draw? No reason? No other possible conclusion? You should argue the opposit

There is no reason the number shouldn't be near 50%...What other conclusion can you draw? No reason? No other possible conclusion? You should argue the opposite position and try to pass an ideological turing test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_Turing_Test http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ideological_Turing_Test Here are some sources to get you started on your research: http://blog.dilbert.com/post/114055529676/my-verdict-on-gender-bias-in-the-workplace http://blog.dilbert.com/post/114055529676/my-verdict-on-gend... http://www.amazon.com/Why-Sex-Matters-Darwinian-Behavior-ebook/dp/B00NDDDI4G/ http://www.amazon.com/Why-Sex-Matters-Darwinian-Behavior-ebo...

mattmanser 11y ago
Nope, no other reason. As I said, there's been decades, the process and culture so is obviously skewed in favour of men. Pretend otherwise all you like. One day you'll realise that deep down you honestly thought men were better than women at business. Which is utter bollocks, it's simply corporate culture is heavily biased and needs a good kick up the ass. That Scott Adams post is stupid by the way, he even starts talking about the gender bias at the end but frames it as 'societal'. If a woman takes a break from her career to have a kid and then cccomes back 2 years later, why has her career stalled? Societal norms, says Scott Adams, not gender bias at all! Do you get it yet? The whole of business is set up to favour men. Until the 'societal norms' change to be fairer to women so they can actually have a chance to become leaders and senior management while still being allowed to have a family, it won't be a fair society. We're seeing it happen in the UK parliament now women only short lists have vastly I creased the women MPs, the working life of an MP is changing to become women friendly because it's been forced on them. The same thing has to happen in business.

mattmanser 11y ago

Nope, no other reason. As I said, there's been decades, the process and culture so is obviously skewed in favour of men. Pretend otherwise all you like. One day you'll realise that deep down you honestly thought men were better than women at business. Which is utter bollocks, it's simply corporate culture is heavily biased and needs a good kick up the ass. That Scott Adams post is stupid by the way, he even starts talking about the gender bias at the end but frames it as 'societal'. If a woman takes a break from her career to have a kid and then cccomes back 2 years later, why has her career stalled? Societal norms, says Scott Adams, not gender bias at all! Do you get it yet? The whole of business is set up to favour men. Until the 'societal norms' change to be fairer to women so they can actually have a chance to become leaders and senior management while still being allowed to have a family, it won't be a fair society. We're seeing it happen in the UK parliament now women only short lists have vastly I creased the women MPs, the working life of an MP is changing to become women friendly because it's been forced on them. The same thing has to happen in business.