4 ms·
Perhaps I should have been more clear as to have prevented assumptions. I do not think that ride sharing drivers are employees. The IRS's definitions are not cl
by dylanjermiah 11y ago
Perhaps I should have been more clear as to have prevented assumptions. I do not think that ride sharing drivers are employees. The IRS's definitions are not clear, objective or definite. They're open to interpretation and abuse.
- smil 11y agoUber is not a "ride sharing" service.
- dylanjermiah 11y agoAgree. What's a more appropriate term to use?
- extra88 11y agoTaxi service.
- imaginenore 11y agoTaxi arrangement service. They don't actually taxi you.
- extra88 11y agoIf Uber drivers are classified as employees, not contractors, then Uber does actually taxi you. That's the issue at hand.
- waterlesscloud 11y agoUnlicensed taxi service, with the pros and cons that implies.