4 ms·
1. Just because a mental state like love has a known chemical or evolutionary basis doesn't make it any less real. 2. I say the father is concerned about his d
by a-priori 17y ago
1. Just because a mental state like love has a known chemical or evolutionary basis doesn't make it any less real.
2. I say the father is concerned about his daughter's mate selection because she carries his genes. She is a proxy for his reproductive success. He wants her to choose a good mate (e.g. someone who's more likely to stick around to care for the children) so his genes are more likely to survive.
3. No comment here, but I think it underestimates the effects of social proof in a parent's decision.
- mquander 17y ago1. My primary target of ridicule on this one was the apparently arbitrary cutoff of "three years." 2. I'm not a parent, but what you just described is not at all what normal people would mean when using the words "sexual jealousy." 3. I personally think it speaks to a pretty unbelievable sense of privilege; there are a hell of a lot of jobs that don't support a reasonable standard of living for a family of four on one income.
- a-priori 17y agoRegarding #2, that's exactly my point: the father's behaviour can be explained completely without resorting to a sort of reverse Oedipus complex.