2 ms·
I don't know which is worse... that they're doing this, or that for "only" $1300 a month, I would probably rent from them if I had the option.
by jlarocco 11y ago
I don't know which is worse... that they're doing this, or that for "only" $1300 a month, I would probably rent from them if I had the option.
- hkmurakami 11y agoWhich real estate market are you in? The article states that many of the purchases were done in areas hit hard by the recession. I can't imagine $1300/mo is actually that good a bargain. Also, as other posters have mentioned, you aren't likely to keep that $1300/mo price tag for long if the area does recover.
- jlarocco 11y agoBoulder, CO.