Why are you concerned? It's an approach. It seems to work pretty well. It's possible it could be improved, does that mean we should not display the results of

Why are you concerned? It's an approach. It seems to work pretty well. It's possible it could be improved, does that mean we should not display the results of this because it might not be the most efficient result? I didn't downvote, but it's tiresome to hear "Yeah, that's all cool and everything, but I'm concerned that it might not be the absolute best." Nobody claimed it was the most efficient approach ever possible, only that it was cool, surprising, and reasonably ground breaking. You can't really tell if it's the most efficient approach until you try it, and compare it with a model that you think might be a more efficient approach.