4 ms·
Open-source is not just about the product's source being visible. They would need people to review patches, venues to interact with contributors, a policy to pu
by espadrine 11y ago
Open-source is not just about the product's source being visible. They would need people to review patches, venues to interact with contributors, a policy to publicize future features to avoid clashing with contributors' work…
- thecatspaw 11y agothey could also do visible-source.
- vezzy-fnord 11y agoThose are project management/administrative details that have nothing to do with the definition of open source itself. As it stands, the project's continuous use of the word "free" to mean gratis when marketing software meant for other programmers (if it was for non-technical users, I wouldn't object), I find to be deceptive.