3 ms·

Except under our current law, premiums have gone up by 50% in order to pay for subsidized insurance. So for the average person, they got hit with a huge price i

Except under our current law, premiums have gone up by 50% in order to pay for subsidized insurance. So for the average person, they got hit with a huge price increase at the same time they saw a large decrease in value (access to specialists). http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2014/06/18/3137-county-analysis-obamacare-increased-2014-individual-market-premiums-by-average-of-49/ http://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2014/06/18/3137-co... In my case, a family member went to a local oncologist who prescribed a series of treatments. She went for a second opinion to MD Anderson in Houston (a few states away) and was told by their team this treatment was ludicrous and they prescribed an entirely different series of treatments. My family member is now just fine, but if they had stayed with the local specialist who knows. But if I get sick I want access to places with the best long term survival rates, not whichever doctor happened to move next door.

exelius 11y ago
The new laws had nothing to do with the price increases; rapidly increasing premiums coupled with reduced benefits are a trend that stretches back to the mid-90s. Obamacare actually caused a temporary slowdown in premium hikes, though they have since picked back up to the previous pace. I don't have the data in front of me right now, but I've looked it up in the past enough times. And yes, Obamacare did increase costs for young, healthy people. But one day, those young, healthy people are not going to be so young or healthy; and the system will need new young, healthy people to help subsidize the cost of health care for the old and sick. Or to put it another way: if we as a society don't want to deny life-saving health care based on a person's ability to pay, we have to make everyone pay all the time. And honestly, it's cheaper overall if people have less hesitation to go to the doctor and get their medical issues treated before they become serious and life-threatening, so we should pay to treat the non life-threatening conditions as well because it's a better use of money.

exelius 11y ago

The new laws had nothing to do with the price increases; rapidly increasing premiums coupled with reduced benefits are a trend that stretches back to the mid-90s. Obamacare actually caused a temporary slowdown in premium hikes, though they have since picked back up to the previous pace. I don't have the data in front of me right now, but I've looked it up in the past enough times. And yes, Obamacare did increase costs for young, healthy people. But one day, those young, healthy people are not going to be so young or healthy; and the system will need new young, healthy people to help subsidize the cost of health care for the old and sick. Or to put it another way: if we as a society don't want to deny life-saving health care based on a person's ability to pay, we have to make everyone pay all the time. And honestly, it's cheaper overall if people have less hesitation to go to the doctor and get their medical issues treated before they become serious and life-threatening, so we should pay to treat the non life-threatening conditions as well because it's a better use of money.