Insurance companies regularly engage private investigators to spy upon and photograph people they suspect of fraud, or whom they just want to find an excuse to

Insurance companies regularly engage private investigators to spy upon and photograph people they suspect of fraud, or whom they just want to find an excuse to stop providing benefits to. Sadly, I don't know how controversial or different this is (putting aside my personal feelings about it). The only real difference here is that an insurance investigator found photos instead of taking them. Either way, the same photos taken by an investigator would have been used the same way.