3 ms·
The sampling is wrong. Picking the largest municipalities isn't picking the largest cities; it's picking the regions with the best political organization. Jacks
by scythe 11y ago
The sampling is wrong. Picking the largest municipalities isn't picking the largest cities; it's picking the regions with the best political organization. Jacksonville proper has about twice as many people as Miami proper, but you'd be insane to say Jacksonville is a "larger city": Miami's core is way denser and the metro area is four times as populated. Similarly, putting San Jose on the list instead of San Francisco doesn't make any sense. You could include northern San Mateo county and Oakland (which adds up to 1.5M) as "San Francisco" and you'd still get a higher ratio than in San Jose. Cities whose boundaries sprawl are concurrently more suburban and more populous: that's confounding.
A better list would be: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Washington, San Francisco, Boston, Philadelphia, Houston, Miami, Dallas.
- ZanyProgrammer 11y agoYeah, no one (at least here) thinks SF is a bigger and more important city than San Jose. And for all its wanna be bragging as a big city, San Jose is not the capital of Silicon Valley-at a minimum SV is diffuse and spread out throughout Santa Clara County, spilling out into the surrounding counties.
- mercutio2 11y agoHmm. Certainly no one should think San Francisco is bigger than San Jose. But more important? Certainly all my friends who live on the peninsula think SF is more important! SJ is not exactly renowned for its urban features.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]