5 ms·
Other solution: don't use a CMS that mixes plugins code with the core code with absolutely no sandboxing or even a separation between the core and the API.
by eloisant 11y ago
Other solution: don't use a CMS that mixes plugins code with the core code with absolutely no sandboxing or even a separation between the core and the API.
- marknow 11y agoThis. WP frustrates the stew out of me, precisely because it mixes concerns. All. The. Freakin'. Time. Arrrgh!
- techdevman 11y agoYes but Wordpress is ubiquitous and so has the most plugins, helpful blog posts written about it, easy-to-use features, and so on. For most people it is the best choice.
- hullo 11y agotechdevman, unfortunately your posts are dead and you probably aren't aware of it. I would welcome you to the site, but the site has evidently decided it doesn't want you here. :-(
- josephjrobison 11y agoWhat's a good alternative to WordPress that allows some level of ease of use for the non-developer site owner, while also checks the boxes for the technical issues you see? Truly want to know because I don't know the answer!
- Aldo_MX 11y agoIf your end users at least know how to edit Markdown (or HTML/CSS), try October CMS. If they aren't, I apologize because I don't got a recommendation for you.
- blueatlas 11y agoGive Concrete5 a try. MVC, common sense architecture, highly customizable, very easy UI for content editors, great community. http://www.concrete5.org/ http://www.concrete5.org/.
- davidgerard 11y agoFor blogging, WordPress is about the least worst there is. The key thing is: you don't have to run it yourself. For almost all users, wordpress.com is the answer. Automattic take care of all the rubbish for you. If you're fussy about themes, there are any number of third-party providers who will give you more wiggle room than wordpress.com but take care of the tedious rubbish for you. If you really want to run it yourself, there is a huge ecosphere of designers, consultants and sysadmins.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]