4 ms·
Much as I agree, I'd say widespread adoption is iffy at best. For one thing, Cyclone was last updated in 2006. For another, Cyclone imposes some performance d
by jcl 17y ago
Much as I agree, I'd say widespread adoption is iffy at best. For one thing, Cyclone was last updated in 2006. For another, Cyclone imposes some performance degradation (about 50% slower, according to one paper). For many projects, performance is the reason they're using C in the first place.
- b-man 17y agoBut for many more projects, C is just there because it was there at the start. For those Cyclone seems very ok.
- jrockway 17y agoI would say that only a very small percentage of C programs are C for speed. Often, they are C for historical reasons instead. (I can't think of any program I use on a daily basis that is C-for-performance, but I can think of a lot that are written in C. This means I get all the crashes and security problems associated with C, but I spend all my time waiting in IO and can't see any of the benefits. These applications would do very well with Cyclone.)