3 ms·
Rust only recently hit 1.0, so it's pretty obvious why somebody would not have built their software using that.
by chc 11y ago
Rust only recently hit 1.0, so it's pretty obvious why somebody would not have built their software using that.
- bobdole1971 11y agoYes, my mistake.
- Jfreegman 11y agoAlso, current benchmarks show Rust to be about ~3x slower than C, making it more comparable to Go or Java.
- chc 11y agoInteresting. Do you know of any good, recent benchmarks of Rust? I haven't seen a whole lot. The Benchmarks Game mostly appears to show Rust being closer than that in general, though the Rust benchmarks seem to be kind of crap.
- steveklabnik 11y agoA few months back, we were beating C on some benchmarks, though with the focus on semantics for 1.0, I'm sure there were some regressions.