4 ms·
Are there not legal ramifications for automatically sharing what is presumed to be private correspondence? For example a politician might well reply with infor
by glomph 11y ago
Are there not legal ramifications for automatically sharing what is presumed to be private correspondence?
For example a politician might well reply with information that is not intended for general circulation (private information etc).
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- oceanplexian 11y agoYes there is. Public disclosure of private facts but only if it's not in the public interest AND it needs to be offensive. But realistically this is the United States and you're going to have a hell of a time convincing a judge to go for it. US libel and privacy law is very weak.
- glomph 11y agoThis isn't anywhere. I am in the UK and the internet is international.