2 ms·
Yep, I completely agree with you. The other advantage non-qwerty layouts have is that you can't cheat by looking at the keys, which greatly serves to push you
by mightybyte 11y ago
Yep, I completely agree with you. The other advantage non-qwerty layouts have is that you can't cheat by looking at the keys, which greatly serves to push you in the right direction.
Side note: After typing exclusively on dvorak for ~10 years now I actually think that it's not the best layout to maximize potential typing speed. (I've never gotten as fast with dvorak as I used to be with qwerty.) Dvorak focuses too much on single key locations and alternating hands. I think to get the maximum speed a layout needs to focus a lot more on runs, making sure the most common n-grams are typeable with out-to-in or in-to-out runs of adjacent fingers in the same hand. I've thought about working on this, but quite a bit of work would be needed to develop a new and more accurate cost model and find a layout that optimizes it--I've got too many other competing interests. But I'd love to see it done.
- phlyingpenguin 11y agoI have a similar experience to your side note, but I'll say that I wouldn't change from Dvorak for anything. It may or may not change RSI and it may or may not be good for speed, but it's very comfortable for my daily typing tasks so I'm hooked.