4 ms·

I don't get it. This seems like a ploy by google to trick users into leaving their microphones open so they can collect data. If you already need an internet co

by jgrowl 11y ago

I don't get it. This seems like a ploy by google to trick users into leaving their microphones open so they can collect data. If you already need an internet connection to visit the url it gives you, why not transmit the url via the internet. This would more secure anyway since you could just choose the people you want to sync with. Am I just missing something?

Roodgorf 11y ago
And on top of that what sort of people are wanting/using this sort of thing? The url/image/etc. can be just as easily sent over an Instant Messaging service or email as you said with the bonus that you are not interrupted in the middle of what you're doing some some cat gif. I'm failing so see any demand for this, business or leisurely.
- digi_owl 11y ago
  I think Google talked about using something similar for (temporary) pairing a device with Chromecast without them being on the same LAN.
- jsonau 11y ago
  I can see meetings and presentations using this very well. You can broadcast a link locally with a push of a button -- no need to know anyone's email or screen name. Listener don't even need to know the URL itself. This makes UX near seamless! Imagine giving a presentation in a public conference, you can provide resource (per x slide) to all of your listeners(strangers and what not) for referencing without ever saying anything about it.
  - Roodgorf 11y ago
    Okay, I can see that I suppose. My thought was mostly that, if each individual is expected to be running the extension then they are pretty likely they are in a situation where everyone has some easily accessible form of communicating with each other. At least, in all of the businesses I've been in setting up some sort of meeting chat or IRC channel is pretty standard, trivial at the least. That being said, having a way to do this on the fly could be pretty convenient now that I think about it more.
soylentcola 11y ago
I dunno...room full of people (like a meeting or a large class) where you may not have everyone's email address or IM and want to "beam" out a link on the fly without a lot of fuss? Or maybe a way to sync up a performance with the people in the audience like Dan Deacon did a while back. In that case it was an app that picked up on tones in the music to control the graphics on the phones of concertgoers. Off the top of my head I can think of a few neat things I could do in a room or building full of devices set up to listen in this way. Not everything is a cynical plot. I've found that most things can be exploited for malicious (or just pranking/annoying) ends but it doesn't stop us from trying out new things. Edit: just thought of another one I might try out - use tones in audio track to send browser to a page that changes the color of my Hue lamps. Probably not super useful in the current state but the concept is great and would let me make synced lighting tracks. I wonder how well this would work with less audible (or at least less distracting) tones in a similar application?

by jgrowl 11y ago

Roodgorf 11y ago

And on top of that what sort of people are wanting/using this sort of thing? The url/image/etc. can be just as easily sent over an Instant Messaging service or email as you said with the bonus that you are not interrupted in the middle of what you're doing some some cat gif. I'm failing so see any demand for this, business or leisurely.

digi_owl 11y ago
I think Google talked about using something similar for (temporary) pairing a device with Chromecast without them being on the same LAN.
jsonau 11y ago
I can see meetings and presentations using this very well. You can broadcast a link locally with a push of a button -- no need to know anyone's email or screen name. Listener don't even need to know the URL itself. This makes UX near seamless! Imagine giving a presentation in a public conference, you can provide resource (per x slide) to all of your listeners(strangers and what not) for referencing without ever saying anything about it.
- Roodgorf 11y ago
  Okay, I can see that I suppose. My thought was mostly that, if each individual is expected to be running the extension then they are pretty likely they are in a situation where everyone has some easily accessible form of communicating with each other. At least, in all of the businesses I've been in setting up some sort of meeting chat or IRC channel is pretty standard, trivial at the least. That being said, having a way to do this on the fly could be pretty convenient now that I think about it more.

soylentcola 11y ago

I dunno...room full of people (like a meeting or a large class) where you may not have everyone's email address or IM and want to "beam" out a link on the fly without a lot of fuss? Or maybe a way to sync up a performance with the people in the audience like Dan Deacon did a while back. In that case it was an app that picked up on tones in the music to control the graphics on the phones of concertgoers. Off the top of my head I can think of a few neat things I could do in a room or building full of devices set up to listen in this way. Not everything is a cynical plot. I've found that most things can be exploited for malicious (or just pranking/annoying) ends but it doesn't stop us from trying out new things. Edit: just thought of another one I might try out - use tones in audio track to send browser to a page that changes the color of my Hue lamps. Probably not super useful in the current state but the concept is great and would let me make synced lighting tracks. I wonder how well this would work with less audible (or at least less distracting) tones in a similar application?