4 ms·
Yeah. The company I work for was acquired by a big player in the industry, and one of the first things they wanted to do was move us off AWS, because the COO se
by vosper 11y ago
Yeah. The company I work for was acquired by a big player in the industry, and one of the first things they wanted to do was move us off AWS, because the COO sees Amazon as a competitor and thinks that they'll go snooping in our databases to get a competitive advantage [1]. We managed to stave it off by coming up with a vague plan for how we'd move critical infrastructure to hardware, then shelving it indefinitely.
AWS was (and is) critical to our velocity - unlike every other team in the company, we don't wait 6 weeks to start working on something while IT eventually gets around to writing a hardware purchase order and racking the gear. We don't compete for "the staging environment" because we can have as many environments as we want.
[1] This is a ludicrous idea. My two main rebuttals are:
- AWS takes in more revenue than our company, and they would destroy that business if it ever got out that their engineers were snooping in customer data
- Netflix is a much more direct competitor than we are (they compete with Amazon Video) and also a much heavier user of (and cheerleader for, even) AWS
- nimblegorilla 11y agoIt might be time for tinfoil hats, but maybe Amazon only competes with Netflix because Netflix demonstrated how awesome Amazon's servers work for video delivery?
- bashinator 11y agoNetflix doesn't use AWS for the actual video delivery.
- throwawayaway 11y agooh no, never engineers. always maintain a layer of plausible deniability, those engineers might turn coat and rat the organisation out you see.