Didn't mean to imply you did. That comment was about how it's being reported in the media in general, should have made it more clear. Edit: I think I was more

Didn't mean to imply you did. That comment was about how it's being reported in the media in general, should have made it more clear. Edit: I think I was more reinforcing your point than challenging it, basically "the main issue is different standards of IP protection laws; without (an unusual level of) malice involved.", but it's being reported as a movie plot heist...