3 ms·
>but still bad for the "free market". Yet another case whereby a natural consequence of a free market is "bad" for the free market. In reality it's only bad f
by plaguuuuuu 11y ago
>but still bad for the "free market".
Yet another case whereby a natural consequence of a free market is "bad" for the free market.
In reality it's only bad for the consumer, and certainly not the businesses.
- ploxiln 11y agoAnd that second case really annoys me, but I'd still rather not take the alternative to a free market, which is that idiots and douchebags decide what's good for me, and leave me with even less choice.