4 ms·
As "the legal council in question", this is actually not the problem at all :) There are actually remarkably simpler problem than this: For starters, Everyon
by DannyBee 11y ago
As "the legal council in question", this is actually not the problem at all :)
There are actually remarkably simpler problem than this:
For starters,
Everyone in the world, using go, would now have to reproduce two copyright notices, instead of one.
If they messed up, intel could sue them :)
Exporting that liability to the rest of the world would be irresponsible.
In any case, it's not just about mixed licenses.
In a good open source project, everyone contributes on the same terms.
Period.
- mordocai 11y agoYou are unlikely to read this at this point, but I was going through my old comments and just saw your reply. In any case, I was commenting on the purpose of the CLA in general. I believe my comment still applies accurately to that. As far as the specific issue goes, I agree that everyone should be contributing under the same license.